Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour party (LP) in the 2023 general elections, has urged the Judiciary to abide its ‘bounding duty’ to protect society’s value system.
This comes after the apex court adjourned the appeals challenging the victory of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the February 25 election.
A seven-member panel of the Supreme Court judges led by John Okoro, on Monday, adjourned the appeal for judgement after taking the arguments of lawyers to the parties to the case.
Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) alongside Peter Obi of Labour Party (LP) are challenging the victory of Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) who was declared winner of February 25th general elections.
Taking to his X handle on Tuesday , the LP candidate in a statement titled: “THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CREDIBILITY OF LEADERSHIP” stressed the judiciary’s role in upholding transparent rulings.
He noted that the rule of law remains the lifeblood of democracy and the foundation for all fundamental rights as humans, adding that when the fairness and transparency of the judiciary is not assured, the rule of law will come under severe threat.
“There is this saying: “IT IS NOT TITLES THAT HONOUR MEN, BUT MEN THAT HONOUR TITLES.”
“The lofty titles that decorate people in power have little meaning if there is a hollowness and falsehood underneath them. Such titles which adorn those in public office mean nothing if they are not original and are fake if those who bear them have no honour to support the weight of the titles they carry.
In situations where there is public doubt as to the veracity and authenticity of these titles and the claims behind them, it is the judiciary’s role, when called upon, to uphold the honour of the titles through transparent rulings. Only through such judicial interventions can the public be protected from the tyranny of dubious and duplicitous characters and identity fraudsters.
“In such situations, the judiciary has a bounding duty to protect society’s value system. This is one of the obligations of an impartial judiciary in a democracy. The rule of law remains the lifeblood of democracy in all societies and by whatever definition across time.
“It remains the foundation for all our fundamental rights as humans. It is the rule of law that binds society together. The expectation by the high and low alike that their rights will be protected and respected by fair judges in transparent courts is what keeps citizens’ loyalty and belief in democracy.
People, irrespective of their station in life, approach the courts whenever they feel their rights are assailed in the expectation that fair courts will render justice to them according to law.
“However, when the fairness of the judiciary is not assured, and the transparency of judiciary operatives is uncertain, the rule of law will come under severe threat. Once ordinary people lose faith in the fairness of the judiciary, the rule of law is threatened.
“With it, faith in democracy comes under threat as well. A society is endangered when the rule of the powerful and the rule of the rich and the mighty replaces the rule of law. When that happens, justice becomes a commodity to be traded between the rich and powerful and a cult of corrupt judiciary operatives.
When a democracy is based on faulty justice, it opens society to apparent dangers. Governments become subject to impunity and casual violations of the rights of ordinary citizens. The rich and powerful can trample on the rights of the lowly,as there are no consequences for infractions or lawless acts. This can be the groundwork for a democracy to graduate into an autocracy.
US President Joe Biden could not be more apt when he said, “For any young democracy, the most difficult but important step is burying the legacy of tyranny and establishing an economy and a government and institutions that abide by the rule of law.”